Difference between revisions of "Foobar2000 Talk:Components"
(took out old conversation) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- [[User:Canar|Canar]] 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- [[User:Canar|Canar]] 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I thought it might be interesting since theres is not alot of vis available right now. If you guys think it is inappropriate, well remove it. Also, I splited Input section in two other sections, Audio and Game sound. I think it is more convenient this way. Feel free to change title names if they are not correct. My english sucks. --[[User:Eejadx|Eejadx]] 09:14, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 17 May 2006
Someone know if there is a way to set image as a link to another page inside the wiki server?
Things like that doesn't work: ([[Foobar2000:0.9 ATSurround Processor (foo_dsp_atsurround)|Image:Example.jpg]])
--Eejadx 19:47, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
I too would also like to know. Also... I've been lazy with my CSS and layouts this year. --Reglib 17:57, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- Canar 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
I thought it might be interesting since theres is not alot of vis available right now. If you guys think it is inappropriate, well remove it. Also, I splited Input section in two other sections, Audio and Game sound. I think it is more convenient this way. Feel free to change title names if they are not correct. My english sucks. --Eejadx 09:14, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
