Search results

Create the page "Listening test" on this wiki!

• Vorbis
  Informal listening test suggests Vorbis to be comparable to MPEG-4 [[AAC]] at most bitrates and [[M ...odec at [http://web.archive.org/web/20070403025834/http://www.rjamorim.com/test/multiformat128/results.html 128 kbps])
  12 KB (1,706 words) - 13:38, 15 March 2022
• ABX
  ... test|blind]]", or without the listener's knowledge of what the file-under-test is. Another key feature is that the influence of chance on the results can ...on techniques, 3rd ed.'' [1] by Meilgaard, Civille, and Carr, this type of test is referred to as a "duo-trio," but the procedure is the inverse of the abx
  4 KB (628 words) - 18:42, 27 May 2022
• AAC encoders
  ...tied with the [[Apple AAC|Apple encoder]] (then part of QuickTime) [http://listening-tests.hydrogenaud.io/igorc/aac-96-a/results.html]. ...tp://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=29924 last listening test]).
  8 KB (1,228 words) - 22:17, 29 January 2017
• MP3
  Formal and informal listening tests have shown that MP3 at the 160-224 kbps range provide encoded results * <s>Roberto's listening test</s> featuring MP3 encoders
  32 KB (4,966 words) - 09:42, 25 March 2024
• Musepack
  ...e into such low [[bitrate]]s. However, as can be seen in various 128kbit/s listening tests (see below), despite the fact that MPC has been optimized little for == Listening test involving MPC ==
  4 KB (588 words) - 12:10, 28 February 2021
• LAME
  ...rough 4.0 alpha 14 (since 2005). This code is mainly for the developers to test optimizations and architectural changes in LAME's foundational code, ideas Maximum quality is achieved when, regardless of listening conditions, you are unable to detect a difference between the MP3 and the o
  22 KB (3,355 words) - 13:21, 16 March 2020
• ATRAC
  *<s> rjamorim conduced a listening test</s> featuring ATRAC3 at 132kbps.
  2 KB (276 words) - 21:26, 27 January 2022
• Transparency
  ...://lame.sourceforge.net/quality.php Lame MP3 Encoder Quality and Listening Test Information web page]). [[Category:Listening Tests]]
  3 KB (379 words) - 13:50, 4 April 2016
• Blind test
  In summary, a '''blind test''' is needed to prevent what is known as the [[placebo effect]] when trying ...first introduced in medicine, in order to determine the effect of drugs on test subjects without coloring the results with subjective responses from both t
  3 KB (612 words) - 20:51, 23 December 2021
• Xing
  ...g/web/20071005104610/http://www.rjamorim.com/test/ an early 2004 listening test].
  3 KB (447 words) - 22:28, 31 March 2024
• FAQ
  ;Why do you stress blind listening / [[ABX]] tests so much? ;What is an ABX blind test?
  4 KB (597 words) - 23:04, 1 March 2012
• Transcoding
  ...test by guruboolez, from 256 kbps lossy to 128 kbps mp3. According to this test, Ogg Vorbis and MPC performed best, followed by WV4 and AAC with a marginal ...from 192 kbps (preset standard) mp3]. Informal subjective findings (no ABX test) with classic rock music: Ogg 96 or 128 kbps are audibly different from the
  5 KB (815 words) - 21:58, 23 December 2023
• Frequency analysis
  ...cal analysis is often useful, but only when used together with a listening test. The most useful view is the sound spectra view (spectral view in [[Adobe A # Blind listening testing ([[ABX]]) is the only method that can really be justified when test
  1 KB (215 words) - 05:02, 14 May 2012
• Foobar2000:Components
  ...re incorporated in Default user interface, are: Album List, Decoding Speed Test and File Integrity Verifier. ... (foo abx)|ABX comparator (foo_abx)]] · Performs a double-blind listening test between two tracks.
  24 KB (3,339 words) - 21:03, 31 January 2024
• Current events
  '''<span style="color: red;">Important update on Menno's latest test.</span>''' ...e results of the listening test!<br>'''This test has finished. Go to the [[Listening Tests]] page for the links to HA Forum's thread and complete result page.''
  2 KB (395 words) - 19:05, 29 January 2007
• AAC FAQ
  ...is very difficult to quantify the quality of an encoder, [[Listening Tests|listening tests]] are used. ...al listeners concluded that [[iTunes]] (the only AAC codec included in the test) was better than other codecs - even VBR-enabled ones.
  5 KB (876 words) - 11:45, 7 January 2017
• BS.1387
  ...eference wave file, one can use for example: ''eaqual -fref ref.wav -ftest test.wav''. == Comparison with subjective listening tests ==
  6 KB (855 words) - 00:07, 25 August 2023
• Recommended Ogg Vorbis
  ... ''q'' values of ''5 to 10''. It was later judged in an internal listening test that GT3b1 was the better of the two. There was a minor bugfix update earli ... John33 merged the sources to give us GT3b2. Once the 128 kbps multiformat test was completed, Aoyumi's [[aoTuV]] Vorbis tuning was determined to be the be
  27 KB (4,040 words) - 08:17, 14 October 2018
• Hydrogenaudio Listening Tests
  ...ciples]] over the years is by organizing and participating in public blind listening tests of lossy codecs and presenting statistical analyses of the results. T [[Private Listening Tests|Private listening tests]] also provide useful data, but the public HydrogenAudio tests are a
  6 KB (798 words) - 05:18, 5 March 2024
• Placebo effect
  ...nish the placebo effect is by performing a '''[[blind test|blind listening test]]''', e.g. using the [[ABX]] method. [[Category:Listening Tests]]
  444 B (72 words) - 20:56, 15 September 2006