Difference between revisions of "Open source"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(SUGGEST: DELETE)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{delete|'''I don't think this belongs to HA Wiki.'''}}
 
In software applications, being Open Source usually means the applications' source codes are freely available to any one that wants to have them for whatever reason.
 
In software applications, being Open Source usually means the applications' source codes are freely available to any one that wants to have them for whatever reason.
  

Revision as of 08:21, 21 September 2006

It has been proposed that this page be deleted.

Have your say in the discussion to decide the outcome.

The proposed reason for deletion is: 'I don't think this belongs to HA Wiki.'


Please do not subst: this template! If you have just added this notice, click here and add "{{subst:delete2|Open source}}", followed by a short description of why you want it deleted. Be sure to sign it with ~~~~!

In software applications, being Open Source usually means the applications' source codes are freely available to any one that wants to have them for whatever reason.

Such sources are often distributed using an OSI-approved license; usually GPL, LGPL or BSD. But other, non-OSI-approved licenses do exist, like the one used for Monkey's Audio sources.

Any programmer can freely modify such sources and release the modifications, with some catches depending on the license chosen by the copyright holder. For example, the GPL demands that modifications are released under the same license, and the Qt license forbids people of creating code branches.