Difference between revisions of "Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase:Deletion requests/Open source"
From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
(Vote: Delete (wrong site)) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<small>To vote, use this code: {{votecode}}<!-- messy hack--></small><br> | <small>To vote, use this code: {{votecode}}<!-- messy hack--></small><br> | ||
Info like this belongs in wikipedia, IMO. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan|contribs]])'''</small> 03:22, 21 September 2006 (CDT) | Info like this belongs in wikipedia, IMO. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan|contribs]])'''</small> 03:22, 21 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | *Maybe it's linked to on open source encoder pages, etc? Maybe not. '''Delete'''. <small>('''[[Special:Contributions/Elliottmobile|sbirtnoc]] | [[User talk:Elliottmobile|klat]]''')</small> [[User:Elliottmobile|elibomttoillE]] 08:58, 21 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | :Scratch that, '''keep'''. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 13:42, 22 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? [[User:Jan|Jan]] 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''keep''' I agree with Jan, besides, it's better to have a quick summary of what's Open Source, rather than the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source insanely huge] article at Wikipedia [[User:Rjamorim|rjamorim]] 12:32, 7 December 2006 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 18:32, 7 December 2006
Open source
To vote, use this code: * '''YOUR VOTE''' Reason for vote ~~~~
Info like this belongs in wikipedia, IMO. --pepoluan (talk | contribs) 03:22, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe it's linked to on open source encoder pages, etc? Maybe not. Delete. (sbirtnoc | klat) elibomttoillE 08:58, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? Jan 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)
- keep I agree with Jan, besides, it's better to have a quick summary of what's Open Source, rather than the insanely huge article at Wikipedia rjamorim 12:32, 7 December 2006 (CST)