Jump to content

Myths (Vinyl): Revision history

View logs for this page

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

curprev 03:0803:08, 22 July 2016‎ Greynol talk contribs‎ 25,888 bytes −1,243‎ No edit summary
curprev 02:5302:53, 22 July 2016‎ Greynol talk contribs‎ 27,131 bytes −3,890‎ Gross misunderstandings have been removed as well as the back and forth comments. Use the forum for discussion.
curprev 02:4002:40, 22 July 2016‎ Greynol talk contribs‎ m 31,021 bytes −915‎ Reverted edits by Anonyme-x22 (talk) to last revision by 108.61.228.152

curprev 09:1109:11, 19 July 2016‎ Anonyme-x22 talk contribs‎ 31,936 bytes +91‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce
curprev 09:0609:06, 19 July 2016‎ Anonyme-x22 talk contribs‎ 31,845 bytes +9‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce
curprev 09:0109:01, 19 July 2016‎ Anonyme-x22 talk contribs‎ 31,836 bytes +815‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce
curprev 04:3304:33, 19 July 2016‎ 108.61.228.152 talk‎ 31,021 bytes −817‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce

curprev 09:2309:23, 18 July 2016‎ Anonyme-x22 talk contribs‎ 31,838 bytes +817‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce

curprev 13:2613:26, 14 July 2016‎ 124.171.251.232 talk‎ 31,021 bytes −802‎ No edit summary

curprev 00:5900:59, 14 June 2016‎ 108.61.228.121 talk‎ 30,940 bytes +144‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce
curprev 00:4400:44, 14 June 2016‎ 108.61.228.121 talk‎ 30,796 bytes +3‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl sounds better than CD
curprev 00:4300:43, 14 June 2016‎ 108.61.228.121 talk‎ 30,793 bytes +30‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl sounds better than CD

curprev 06:4306:43, 27 May 2016‎ 108.61.228.155 talk‎ 30,763 bytes +93‎ No edit summary

curprev 02:3302:33, 26 May 2016‎ 108.61.228.2 talk‎ 30,670 bytes +134‎ →‎Frequency resolution
curprev 02:2902:29, 26 May 2016‎ 108.61.228.2 talk‎ 30,536 bytes +708‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce
curprev 02:1702:17, 26 May 2016‎ 108.61.228.2 talk‎ 29,828 bytes −3‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl sounds better than CD
curprev 02:1502:15, 26 May 2016‎ 108.61.228.2 talk‎ 29,831 bytes +958‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl sounds better than CD

curprev 21:5821:58, 23 April 2016‎ 73.252.129.148 talk‎ 27,133 bytes +2‎ →‎Vinyl is often sourced from digital anyway

curprev 14:0514:05, 31 March 2016‎ 79.186.164.228 talk‎ 27,131 bytes +10‎ corrected information

curprev 19:4419:44, 2 February 2016‎ 98.145.23.51 talk‎ 27,121 bytes +1‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl sounds better than CD

curprev 17:3117:31, 31 December 2015‎ 90.199.15.201 talk‎ 27,120 bytes +263‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl requires a better-sounding master because it is physically incapable of reproducing the hypercompressed sound mastered to CD: Added Seal example

curprev 02:5802:58, 13 November 2015‎ 120.151.164.49 talk‎ 26,857 bytes −308‎ →‎Further comparisons

curprev 06:0906:09, 4 November 2015‎ 120.151.164.49 talk‎ 27,165 bytes +1,307‎ →‎Myth: Vinyl is better than digital because the analog signal on the vinyl tracks the analog signal exactly, while digital is quantized into steps

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Myths_(Vinyl)"