User talk:Chrisjj - Revision history

Chrisjj: Blanked the page

2012-07-23T23:01:01Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 23 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==ReplayGain compliance==~~
	Your edit to the [[Replay Gain]] article indicates you believe that an 89 dB reference level is noncompliant, but 2Bdecided (the inventor of Replay Gain) said in [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=52991&view=findpost&p=475019 a forum post] that the proposed Replay Gain spec expected players to add 6 dB to the 83 dB reference level used by the scanners, but what has happened instead is that the scanners all just use 89 dB and the players don't add anything. So I don't think it's necessary to single out MediaMonkey as being "noncompliant" in this regard; it's simply going along with the de facto standard that all the other implementations adhere to. [[User:Mjb\|Mjb]] 23:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
	~~===I see no such edit of mine [[User:Chrisjj\|Chrisjj]] 01:00, 24 July 2012 (CEST) ===~~

Chrisjj: /* ReplayGain compliance */

2012-07-23T23:00:51Z

ReplayGain compliance

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 23 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==ReplayGain compliance==		==ReplayGain compliance==
	Your edit to the [[Replay Gain]] article indicates you believe that an 89 dB reference level is noncompliant, but 2Bdecided (the inventor of Replay Gain) said in [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=52991&view=findpost&p=475019 a forum post] that the proposed Replay Gain spec expected players to add 6 dB to the 83 dB reference level used by the scanners, but what has happened instead is that the scanners all just use 89 dB and the players don't add anything. So I don't think it's necessary to single out MediaMonkey as being "noncompliant" in this regard; it's simply going along with the de facto standard that all the other implementations adhere to. [[User:Mjb\|Mjb]] 23:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		Your edit to the [[Replay Gain]] article indicates you believe that an 89 dB reference level is noncompliant, but 2Bdecided (the inventor of Replay Gain) said in [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=52991&view=findpost&p=475019 a forum post] that the proposed Replay Gain spec expected players to add 6 dB to the 83 dB reference level used by the scanners, but what has happened instead is that the scanners all just use 89 dB and the players don't add anything. So I don't think it's necessary to single out MediaMonkey as being "noncompliant" in this regard; it's simply going along with the de facto standard that all the other implementations adhere to. [[User:Mjb\|Mjb]] 23:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
			===I see no such edit of mine [[User:Chrisjj\|Chrisjj]] 01:00, 24 July 2012 (CEST) ===

Mjb: It sounds like MediaMonkey is just following the de facto standard, so it shouldn't be singled out as 'noncompliant'

2010-09-07T23:45:38Z

It sounds like MediaMonkey is just following the de facto standard, so it shouldn't be singled out as 'noncompliant'

New page

==ReplayGain compliance==
Your edit to the [[Replay Gain]] article indicates you believe that an 89 dB reference level is noncompliant, but 2Bdecided (the inventor of Replay Gain) said in [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=52991&view=findpost&p=475019 a forum post] that the proposed Replay Gain spec expected players to add 6 dB to the 83 dB reference level used by the scanners, but what has happened instead is that the scanners all just use 89 dB and the players don't add anything. So I don't think it's necessary to single out MediaMonkey as being "noncompliant" in this regard; it's simply going along with the de facto standard that all the other implementations adhere to. [[User:Mjb|Mjb]] 23:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)