User talk:Canar - Revision history

Canar at 22:45, 26 September 2006

2006-09-26T22:45:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 26 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~No more issue. Baleeted. Thanks, Jan. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 15:27, 24 September 2006 (CDT)~~

	~~Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)~~

	If anyone feels it necessary to revert this page, please do so. You may access the content of previous versions in the history. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:44, 26 September 2006 (CDT)		If anyone feels it necessary to revert this page, please do so. You may access the content of previous versions in the history. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:44, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Canar at 22:44, 26 September 2006

2006-09-26T22:44:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 26 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)		Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

			If anyone feels it necessary to revert this page, please do so. You may access the content of previous versions in the history. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:44, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Canar: This proves it. I have bad manners.

2006-09-26T22:40:51Z

This proves it. I have bad manners.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 26 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)		Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

	~~== In response to you: ==~~

	~~"There was no reason for you to interfere with the templates on my talk page or the name of the article I am working on that I linked to on my user page. Kindly sod off."~~

	First, talkheader is required to go at the start of all pages. It just does. And I didn't change any article name. In regards to "Kindy sod off," would I be right in thinking that's a personal attack? You obviously canot reason beyond flames thus I will terminate this discussion now. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:16, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
	::My talk page has none because nobody has thought to add one yet. Remember, ''anyone'' can change anything, and that includes your wishes. It is not "your document" at all. And, the software defines Something/page as a subpage and properly handles it. On that note...

	~~@@@ This is a header @@@<br />~~
	This is bold. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

	~~== Removing comments from your talk page ==~~

	Hi, at Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage and create a new talk page. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee\|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee\|lee]] 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
	~~:Edited. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee\|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee\|lee]] 13:28, 26 September 2006 (CDT)~~

Kjoonlee: /* Removing comments from your talk page */

2006-09-26T18:28:29Z

Removing comments from your talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 26 September 2006
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== Removing comments from your talk page ==		== Removing comments from your talk page ==

	At Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee\|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee\|lee]] 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)		Hi, at Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage and create a new talk page. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee\|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee\|lee]] 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
			:Edited. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee\|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee\|lee]] 13:28, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Kjoonlee: Removing comments from your talk page

2006-09-26T18:25:51Z

Removing comments from your talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 26 September 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:
	@@@ This is a header @@@<br />		@@@ This is a header @@@<br />
	This is bold. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)		This is bold. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

			== Removing comments from your talk page ==

			At Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee\|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee\|lee]] 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Elliottmobile: revert - removing messages is offensive

2006-09-26T17:55:08Z

revert - removing messages is offensive

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 26 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)		Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

			== In response to you: ==

			"There was no reason for you to interfere with the templates on my talk page or the name of the article I am working on that I linked to on my user page. Kindly sod off."

			First, talkheader is required to go at the start of all pages. It just does. And I didn't change any article name. In regards to "Kindy sod off," would I be right in thinking that's a personal attack? You obviously canot reason beyond flames thus I will terminate this discussion now. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:16, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

			Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

			:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
			::My talk page has none because nobody has thought to add one yet. Remember, ''anyone'' can change anything, and that includes your wishes. It is not "your document" at all. And, the software defines Something/page as a subpage and properly handles it. On that note...

			@@@ This is a header @@@<br />
			This is bold. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Canar at 14:51, 26 September 2006

2006-09-26T14:51:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 26 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)		Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

	~~== In response to you: ==~~

	~~"There was no reason for you to interfere with the templates on my talk page or the name of the article I am working on that I linked to on my user page. Kindly sod off."~~

	First, talkheader is required to go at the start of all pages. It just does. And I didn't change any article name. In regards to "Kindy sod off," would I be right in thinking that's a personal attack? You obviously canot reason beyond flames thus I will terminate this discussion now. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:16, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
	::My talk page has none because nobody has thought to add one yet. Remember, ''anyone'' can change anything, and that includes your wishes. It is not "your document" at all. And, the software defines Something/page as a subpage and properly handles it. On that note...

	~~@@@ This is a header @@@<br />~~
	This is bold. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Elliottmobile: /* In response to you: */

2006-09-26T08:09:46Z

In response to you:

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:09, 26 September 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
			::My talk page has none because nobody has thought to add one yet. Remember, ''anyone'' can change anything, and that includes your wishes. It is not "your document" at all. And, the software defines Something/page as a subpage and properly handles it. On that note...

			@@@ This is a header @@@<br />
			This is bold. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Canar: /* In response to you: */

2006-09-26T04:10:19Z

In response to you:

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 26 September 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps ~~they were~~ not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

Canar at 02:59, 26 September 2006

2006-09-26T02:59:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 26 September 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

			:Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps they were not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- [[User:Canar\|Canar]] 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)