Template talk:Stub - Revision history

Elliottmobile: /* Usage? */

2006-09-22T16:04:09Z

Usage?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 22 September 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Usage?==		==Usage?==
	Someone in the forums [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=48046&view=findpost&p=428094 here] said that stubs should be located '''on top''' of an article. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:41, 22 September 2006 (CDT)		Someone in the forums [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=48046&view=findpost&p=428094 here] said that stubs should be located '''on top''' of an article. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:41, 22 September 2006 (CDT)
			:I don't agree, (besides it's one persons opinion - a discussion would be best). The fact that an article is a stub isn't critical information, but it is worth a mention. Thus, a footer. just my opinion. {{smiley\|)}} <small>('''[[Special:Contributions/Elliottmobile\|sbirtnoc]] \| [[User talk:Elliottmobile\|klat]]''')</small> [[User:Elliottmobile\|elibomttoillE]] 11:04, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

Pepoluan: /* Usage? */ {{stub}} on top or bottom?

2006-09-22T15:41:27Z

Usage?: {{stub}} on top or bottom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 22 September 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Maybe like the talkheader template; the border is subdued (or none), color is pale-blue-ish, text need not be bold but only italics. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 03:00, 21 September 2006 (CDT)		::Maybe like the talkheader template; the border is subdued (or none), color is pale-blue-ish, text need not be bold but only italics. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 03:00, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

			==Usage?==
			Someone in the forums [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=48046&view=findpost&p=428094 here] said that stubs should be located '''on top''' of an article. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:41, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

Pepoluan at 08:00, 21 September 2006

2006-09-21T08:00:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:00, 21 September 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	What happened to the box? I kinda like it... it gives a nice emphasis to the fact that an article is a stub. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 01:39, 21 September 2006 (CDT)		What happened to the box? I kinda like it... it gives a nice emphasis to the fact that an article is a stub. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 01:39, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
	:Hmm... how else could we emphasise it? A graphic like Wikipedia? I dunno, I just think it makes people look at the big stub notice instead of the article, and ''then'' looking at the stub notice (and possibly expanding it.) <small>('''[[Special:Contributions/Elliottmobile\|sbirtnoc]] \| [[User talk:Elliottmobile\|klat]]''')</small> [[User:Elliottmobile\|elibomttoillE]] 02:57, 21 September 2006 (CDT)		:Hmm... how else could we emphasise it? A graphic like Wikipedia? I dunno, I just think it makes people look at the big stub notice instead of the article, and ''then'' looking at the stub notice (and possibly expanding it.) <small>('''[[Special:Contributions/Elliottmobile\|sbirtnoc]] \| [[User talk:Elliottmobile\|klat]]''')</small> [[User:Elliottmobile\|elibomttoillE]] 02:57, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

			::Maybe like the talkheader template; the border is subdued (or none), color is pale-blue-ish, text need not be bold but only italics. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 03:00, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

Elliottmobile: /* Page Discussion */

2006-09-21T07:57:47Z

Page Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 21 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Page Discussion==		==Page Discussion==
	What happened to the box? I kinda like it... it gives a nice emphasis to the fact that an article is a stub. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 01:39, 21 September 2006 (CDT)		What happened to the box? I kinda like it... it gives a nice emphasis to the fact that an article is a stub. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 01:39, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
			:Hmm... how else could we emphasise it? A graphic like Wikipedia? I dunno, I just think it makes people look at the big stub notice instead of the article, and ''then'' looking at the stub notice (and possibly expanding it.) <small>('''[[Special:Contributions/Elliottmobile\|sbirtnoc]] \| [[User talk:Elliottmobile\|klat]]''')</small> [[User:Elliottmobile\|elibomttoillE]] 02:57, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

Pepoluan: What happened to the box?

2006-09-21T06:39:19Z

What happened to the box?

New page

{{talkheader}}

==Page Discussion==
What happened to the box? I kinda like it... it gives a nice emphasis to the fact that an article is a stub. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan|contribs]])'''</small> 01:39, 21 September 2006 (CDT)