Talk:Vorbis - Revision history

Pepoluan: Sectionize an overlooked part. Minor.

2007-06-22T18:26:26Z

Sectionize an overlooked part. Minor.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 22 June 2007
Line 59:		Line 59:


	~~----~~		==Why Software Infobox?==


	Wait, Ogg Vorbis is codec, right? Why use '''Software''' Infobox? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		Wait, Ogg Vorbis is codec, right? Why use '''Software''' Infobox? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

Pepoluan: /* Recommended Encoder */ Um, no need. Just boldify.

2006-10-04T16:22:03Z

Recommended Encoder: Um, no need. Just boldify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 4 October 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::Agree. I forgot to do that in this page. I'll see what I can do. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:42, 4 October 2006 (CDT)		::Agree. I forgot to do that in this page. I'll see what I can do. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:42, 4 October 2006 (CDT)

			::On second read, I just boldified the note about checking the Recommended Ogg Vorbis page for the recommended encoder version. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:22, 4 October 2006 (CDT)

	==Legal Brouhaha==		==Legal Brouhaha==

Pepoluan: /* Recommended Encoder */ I'll see what I can do

2006-10-04T15:42:09Z

Recommended Encoder: I'll see what I can do

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 4 October 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 17:24, 2 October 2006 (CDT)		--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 17:24, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

	That's a point well taken. It still should be mentioned however. [[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 16:53 3 October 2005 (CDT)		:That's a point well taken. It still should be mentioned however. [[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 16:53 3 October 2005 (CDT)

			::Agree. I forgot to do that in this page. I'll see what I can do. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:42, 4 October 2006 (CDT)

	==Legal Brouhaha==		==Legal Brouhaha==

Pepoluan: /* Ogg Vorbis or Ogg + Vorbis */ Close thread

2006-10-04T15:40:45Z

Ogg Vorbis or Ogg + Vorbis: Close thread

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 4 October 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::: I am overdueing it a little with this page. I just want to be as specific as possible though for anyone who visits it ;-d. Maybe we should add the xiph logo to as well? hmm, also technical Vorbis doesn't use a straight MDCT it uses a FFT to do some tone masking ;-O (that's really irrlevant though). The specs won't tell the user too much about encoding, therefore I'm trying to fill in some technical gaps here. HotshotGG 2:30, 23 June 2005 (EST)		:::: I am overdueing it a little with this page. I just want to be as specific as possible though for anyone who visits it ;-d. Maybe we should add the xiph logo to as well? hmm, also technical Vorbis doesn't use a straight MDCT it uses a FFT to do some tone masking ;-O (that's really irrlevant though). The specs won't tell the user too much about encoding, therefore I'm trying to fill in some technical gaps here. HotshotGG 2:30, 23 June 2005 (EST)

			<s>
	==Ogg Vorbis or Ogg + Vorbis==		==Ogg Vorbis or Ogg + Vorbis==

Line 27:		Line 28:

	: That's not a bad idea. I don't the situation is as bad wikipedia though. Most people who visit this wiki know Vorbis is Vorbis. [[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 20:29, 26 May 2006 (CDT)		: That's not a bad idea. I don't the situation is as bad wikipedia though. Most people who visit this wiki know Vorbis is Vorbis. [[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 20:29, 26 May 2006 (CDT)

			</s>
			::This issue has been taken care of by ElliottMobile, by moving the (previously) Ogg Vorbis page to Vorbis page. IMO this is as it should be, as the [[Topic Index]] explicitly listed [[Tarkin]] and [[Theora]] (as of this commenting, Tarkin is still wanted). --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 10:40, 4 October 2006 (CDT)


	==POSIX==		==POSIX==

HotshotGG: /* Recommended Encoder */

2006-10-03T20:53:51Z

Recommended Encoder

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 3 October 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 17:24, 2 October 2006 (CDT)		--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 17:24, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

			That's a point well taken. It still should be mentioned however. [[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 16:53 3 October 2005 (CDT)

	==Legal Brouhaha==		==Legal Brouhaha==

Elliottmobile: Talk:Ogg Vorbis moved to Talk:Vorbis: vorbis isn't limited to ogg

2006-10-03T17:52:40Z

Talk:Ogg Vorbis moved to Talk:Vorbis: vorbis isn't limited to ogg

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:52, 3 October 2006
(No difference)

Pepoluan: /* Recommended Encoder / My reason why IT MUST BE ONLY* AOTUV R1 AND NOT XIPH 1.1.2

2006-10-02T22:24:58Z

Recommended Encoder: My reason why IT MUST BE *ONLY* AOTUV R1 AND NOT XIPH 1.1.2

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 2 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{talkheader}}		{{talkheader}}

			==Recommended Encoder==

			'''Despite''' what you said in your comment, HotshotGG, remember that this is '''Hydrogenaudio''' Knowledgebase, so the recommended encoder should be what the HA folks recommend, i.e. aoTuV R1. ''Even though'' aoTuV R1 is not part of the mainline.

			I cannot recommend Xiph 1.1.2 with a clear conscience as deep within I know that 1.1.2 is inferior to R1.

			--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 17:24, 2 October 2006 (CDT)


	==Legal Brouhaha==		==Legal Brouhaha==

Elliottmobile: /* The Fish and The Star */

2006-09-25T20:31:44Z

The Fish and The Star

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 25 September 2006
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Awww... using infobox separates the fish from the star... the fish'll cry any day now... --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:23, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		Awww... using infobox separates the fish from the star... the fish'll cry any day now... --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:23, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
			:[[Image:Waahfish.PNG]] {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 15:31, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

Elliottmobile: /* Page Discussion */

2006-09-25T20:29:57Z

Page Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 25 September 2006
Line 47:		Line 47:

	::Sooooo... no one objects to me reverting to pre-Infobox version? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 13:23, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		::Sooooo... no one objects to me reverting to pre-Infobox version? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 13:23, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
			:::Cooking up supermega Codec Infobox as we skeep! {{slimey}} {{User:Elliottmobile/sig2}} 15:29, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	==The Fish and The Star==		==The Fish and The Star==

Pepoluan: /* Page Discussion */ Revert to pre-Infobos? Anyone objects?

2006-09-25T18:23:22Z

Page Discussion: Revert to pre-Infobos? Anyone objects?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 25 September 2006
Line 45:		Line 45:
	Wait, Ogg Vorbis is codec, right? Why use '''Software''' Infobox? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		Wait, Ogg Vorbis is codec, right? Why use '''Software''' Infobox? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 11:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
	: Beats me.... To me this page is the same as the [[MP3]] page. Shouldn't be related to any specific software, only with the format. For software we should have separate pages the same way we have for [[LAME]], [[Xing]], [[Blade]] etc. --[[User:Beto\|Beto]] <small>'''([[User_talk:Beto\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Beto\|contribs]])'''</small> 12:54, 25 September 2006 (CDT)		: Beats me.... To me this page is the same as the [[MP3]] page. Shouldn't be related to any specific software, only with the format. For software we should have separate pages the same way we have for [[LAME]], [[Xing]], [[Blade]] etc. --[[User:Beto\|Beto]] <small>'''([[User_talk:Beto\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Beto\|contribs]])'''</small> 12:54, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

			::Sooooo... no one objects to me reverting to pre-Infobox version? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 13:23, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

	==The Fish and The Star==		==The Fish and The Star==