Talk:Recommended Ogg Vorbis - Revision history

Matt the cat at 14:53, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T14:53:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 17 September 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Out of date==		==Out of date==

	This article is out of date, it should be updated.		This article is out of date, it should be updated.[[User:Matt the cat\|Matt the cat]] 14:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

	==Major rewrite: Colors, linkback, etc.==		==Major rewrite: Colors, linkback, etc.==

Matt the cat at 14:53, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T14:53:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 17 September 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{talkheader}}		{{talkheader}}

			==Out of date==

			This article is out of date, it should be updated.

	==Major rewrite: Colors, linkback, etc.==		==Major rewrite: Colors, linkback, etc.==

Pepoluan: /* Vendor Tag table */ Need aoTuV Beta 5's vendor tag. And move the darn table.

2007-06-22T18:13:15Z

Vendor Tag table: Need aoTuV Beta 5's vendor tag. And move the darn table.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 22 June 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	::The page is getting too wieldy, anyways :-( --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:32, 28 May 2006 (CDT)		::The page is getting too wieldy, anyways :-( --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:32, 28 May 2006 (CDT)

			----

			I need the Vendor Tag for Lancer based on aoTuV Beta 5!

			And I'm dying to move the Vendor Tag table to somewhere else!

			--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan\|contribs]])'''</small> 13:13, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

	==Clunky page==		==Clunky page==

Pepoluan: Major rewrite into sections to ease discussion

2007-06-22T18:12:00Z

Major rewrite into sections to ease discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 22 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{talkheader}}		{{talkheader}}

			==Major rewrite: Colors, linkback, etc.==

	Um, the history here. Shouldn't it be in the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page instead? And a linkback from the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page to this page. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 20:22, 4 January 2006 (CST)		Um, the history here. Shouldn't it be in the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page instead? And a linkback from the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page to this page. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 20:22, 4 January 2006 (CST)
Line 19:		Line 21:


	~~----~~		==aoTuV relation with libvorbis==


	Note: aoTuV beta 2 was merged in xiph.org libvorbis 1.1, but aoTuV beta 3 was never merged in xiph.org. -- ''(Who wrote this?)''		Note: aoTuV beta 2 was merged in xiph.org libvorbis 1.1, but aoTuV beta 3 was never merged in xiph.org. -- ''(Who wrote this?)''


	~~----~~		==Tables & Previews==


	Heyyy... the tables are now grey! I think the tables are better green... but the text better black.<br>And will we please use the Show Preview button before Saving :P it drives me nuts seeing the history is so long... --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:46, 22 January 2006 (CST)		Heyyy... the tables are now grey! I think the tables are better green... but the text better black.<br>And will we please use the Show Preview button before Saving :P it drives me nuts seeing the history is so long... --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:46, 22 January 2006 (CST)


	~~----~~		==Vendor Tag table==


	Do you think the Vendor Tag table is a bit too long to be placed here? It's not <u>that</u> related to the topic anyway? Perhaps we can make another page, i.e. Vorbis:Vendor Tags.		Do you think the Vendor Tag table is a bit too long to be placed here? It's not <u>that</u> related to the topic anyway? Perhaps we can make another page, i.e. Vorbis:Vendor Tags.
Line 43:		Line 42:


	~~----~~		==Clunky page==


	When you quickly read the page, you see first the 4.51 encoders, and only after version 4. You have to read the page in detail to learn that version 4 is really the recommended encoder, and version 4.51 has to get more "peer review". I think the recommended encoder should be listed first, and the latest versions shown below, for those wanting to experiment.		When you quickly read the page, you see first the 4.51 encoders, and only after version 4. You have to read the page in detail to learn that version 4 is really the recommended encoder, and version 4.51 has to get more "peer review". I think the recommended encoder should be listed first, and the latest versions shown below, for those wanting to experiment.

Pepoluan: {{talkheader}}

2007-01-10T18:32:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 10 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{talkheader}}

	Um, the history here. Shouldn't it be in the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page instead? And a linkback from the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page to this page. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 20:22, 4 January 2006 (CST)		Um, the history here. Shouldn't it be in the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page instead? And a linkback from the [[Ogg Vorbis]] page to this page. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 20:22, 4 January 2006 (CST)

Pepoluan at 18:00, 17 July 2006

2006-07-17T18:00:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 17 July 2006
Line 61:		Line 61:
	::I'm sure there are other possible improvements. But this is my list. Now, to figure out the nomenclature of the new pages.		::I'm sure there are other possible improvements. But this is my list. Now, to figure out the nomenclature of the new pages.
	::--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 15:17, 12 July 2006 (CDT)		::--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 15:17, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


	Again it doesn't need to be split. You are just making things more confusing for the average user. Work on some other guides in the wiki. You are stripping out pivotal information that some folks need. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 19:32, 14 July 2006 (CDT)		Again it doesn't need to be split. You are just making things more confusing for the average user. Work on some other guides in the wiki. You are stripping out pivotal information that some folks need. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 19:32, 14 July 2006 (CDT)


			:Okay. NP. My entry above was done the same time as I post the suggestion in the forums. So we'll leave it as it is then.
			:--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 13:00, 17 July 2006 (CDT)

HotshotGG at 23:29, 14 July 2006

2006-07-14T23:29:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 14 July 2006
Line 61:		Line 61:
	::I'm sure there are other possible improvements. But this is my list. Now, to figure out the nomenclature of the new pages.		::I'm sure there are other possible improvements. But this is my list. Now, to figure out the nomenclature of the new pages.
	::--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 15:17, 12 July 2006 (CDT)		::--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 15:17, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

			Again it doesn't need to be split. You are just making things more confusing for the average user. Work on some other guides in the wiki. You are stripping out pivotal information that some folks need. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 19:32, 14 July 2006 (CDT)

Pepoluan at 20:17, 12 July 2006

2006-07-12T20:17:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 12 July 2006
Line 49:		Line 49:

	:IMO this page is getting too big, clunky, and confusing. Split this up! --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)		:IMO this page is getting too big, clunky, and confusing. Split this up! --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)


	:The wiki page should be split and the descripentcy between 4.5 and 4.51 needs to resolved. I was going to re-edit that, but I forget about it. The only reason I have this page on my watchlist is, because it's a popularity contest. I usually focus my efforts elsewhere in the wiki. Let's see what we can do with it though and with your help I was able to transcribe into the wiki, which wouldn't have been done anyway had I not remember QT post from last year anyhow. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 11:17, 10 July 2006 (CDT)		:The wiki page should be split and the descripentcy between 4.5 and 4.51 needs to resolved. I was going to re-edit that, but I forget about it. The only reason I have this page on my watchlist is, because it's a popularity contest. I usually focus my efforts elsewhere in the wiki. Let's see what we can do with it though and with your help I was able to transcribe into the wiki, which wouldn't have been done anyway had I not remember QT post from last year anyhow. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 11:17, 10 July 2006 (CDT)


			::Here's a list of my recommended changes. If no one objects in one week, then that means this list is accepted and changes will commence (by whomever).
			::* History needs to be bulleted, with particular stress on the version & date.
			::* Recommended Vorbis Encoders need to be restructured. I'm not really sure how, but 3rd party source code (i.e. aoTuV) needs to be moved somewhere.
			::* Released Binaries (i.e. the Vorbis Vendor tag) needs its own page, linked to from History.
			::* Advanced Encoder Settings needs its own page, linked to from Recommended Encoder Settings.
			::I'm sure there are other possible improvements. But this is my list. Now, to figure out the nomenclature of the new pages.
			::--[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 15:17, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

HotshotGG at 03:18, 11 July 2006

2006-07-11T03:18:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 11 July 2006
Line 50:		Line 50:
	:IMO this page is getting too big, clunky, and confusing. Split this up! --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)		:IMO this page is getting too big, clunky, and confusing. Split this up! --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)

	:The wiki page should be split and the descripentcy between 4.5 and 4.51 needs to resolved. I was going to re-edit that, but I forget about it. The only reason I have this page on my watchlist is, because it's a popularity contest. I usually focus my efforts elsewhere in the wiki. Let's see what we can do with it though. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 11:17, 10 July 2006 (CDT)		:The wiki page should be split and the descripentcy between 4.5 and 4.51 needs to resolved. I was going to re-edit that, but I forget about it. The only reason I have this page on my watchlist is, because it's a popularity contest. I usually focus my efforts elsewhere in the wiki. Let's see what we can do with it though and with your help I was able to transcribe into the wiki, which wouldn't have been done anyway had I not remember QT post from last year anyhow. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 11:17, 10 July 2006 (CDT)

HotshotGG at 03:16, 11 July 2006

2006-07-11T03:16:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 11 July 2006
Line 44:		Line 44:


	When you read ~~quickly~~ the page, you see first the 4.51 encoders, and only after version 4. You have to read the page in detail to learn that version 4 is really the recommended encoder, and version 4.51 has to get more "peer review". I think the recommended encoder should be listed first, and the latest versions shown below, for those wanting to experiment.		When you quickly read the page, you see first the 4.51 encoders, and only after version 4. You have to read the page in detail to learn that version 4 is really the recommended encoder, and version 4.51 has to get more "peer review". I think the recommended encoder should be listed first, and the latest versions shown below, for those wanting to experiment.
	--[[User:Norz\|Norz]] 08:43, 9 July 2006 (CDT)		--[[User:Norz\|Norz]] 08:43, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


	:IMO this page is getting too big, clunky, and confusing. Split this up! --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)		:IMO this page is getting too big, clunky, and confusing. Split this up! --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 11:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)

			:The wiki page should be split and the descripentcy between 4.5 and 4.51 needs to resolved. I was going to re-edit that, but I forget about it. The only reason I have this page on my watchlist is, because it's a popularity contest. I usually focus my efforts elsewhere in the wiki. Let's see what we can do with it though. --[[User:HotshotGG\|HotshotGG]] 11:17, 10 July 2006 (CDT)