Talk:Bandpass filter - Revision history

Beto: /* Page Discussion */

2006-09-11T16:29:22Z

Page Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 11 September 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:: Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)		:: Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)

			::: I guess you're right. Signal Processing sounds better because it encompassess analog as well.--[[User:Beto\|Beto]] 11:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)

Pepoluan at 14:34, 11 September 2006

2006-09-11T14:34:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 11 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Page Discussion==		==Page Discussion==
	Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)		Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)

	: maybe <nowiki>[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]]</nowiki> would be better?--[[User:Beto\|Beto]] 19:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT)		: maybe <nowiki>[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]]</nowiki> would be better?--[[User:Beto\|Beto]] 19:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT)

			:: Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)

Beto: /* Page Discussion */

2006-09-11T00:11:52Z

Page Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 11 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Page Discussion==		==Page Discussion==
	Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)		Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)
	: maybe <nowiki>[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]]</nowiki> would be better?		: maybe <nowiki>[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]]</nowiki> would be better?--[[User:Beto\|Beto]] 19:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT)

Beto: /* Page Discussion */

2006-09-11T00:11:42Z

Page Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 11 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Page Discussion==		==Page Discussion==
	Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)		Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan\|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)
			: maybe <nowiki>[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]]</nowiki> would be better?

Pepoluan: BPF a DSP? Not really...

2006-09-09T07:23:22Z

BPF a DSP? Not really...

New page

{{talkheader}}

==Page Discussion==
Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)