Talk:Pre-emphasis

2013-11-05T20:46:03Z

70.124.88.175: pre-emphasized, you mean emphasized?

:So when you play a CD through your computer, or use CD ripping software to get the audio content, you're probably getting the ''pre-emphasized audio data''. Since it has not been de-emphasized, it will probably sound too "bright" and/or hissy (although your audio equipment or your damaged ears may keep you from noticing). Therefore you may want to do de-emphasis processing yourself.

If you got the pre-emphasized data, it would sound right, and you wouldn't want to de-emphasize it. Was the above supposed to say "you're probably getting the emphasized audio data"? Maybe the author was thinking 'pre-de-emphasized' and didn't properly cancel the negations. [[Special:Contributions/70.124.88.175|70.124.88.175]] 21:46, 5 November 2013 (CET)

Talk:Rubyripper

2013-10-18T00:53:19Z

70.124.88.175: Yes 3 erroneous bytes can be heard

==Copyediting==
@HotShotGG: I really appreciate the work you're doing. As English is not my native language and my time is limited, I naturally make (hopefully small) mistakes. Your latest changes seem to be an improvement as well. I didn't realize that a personal viewpoint of writing isn't all that professional ;) --[[User:Frodoontop|Frodoontop]] 16:48 01 Nov 2006 (CDT)

Don't worry about it that's why I am here and I enjoy writing. In a technical sense it is when your communicating a message. If it were anything else it wouldn't matter. --[[User:HotshotGG|HotshotGG]] 18:01 01 Nov 2006 (CDT)

:One has to wonder though: can 3 bytes actually be heard in a wav file that produces 180.000 bytes per second?
Yes, they can be heard. Take a file without lots of high-frequency harmonics and put a 0x7FFF or 0x8000 sample in and it will be a very audible pop. [[Special:Contributions/70.124.88.175|70.124.88.175]] 02:53, 18 October 2013 (CEST)

Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase - User contributions [en]

Talk:Pre-emphasis

Talk:Rubyripper