Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Many people prefer listening to music on vinyl rather than on CD or digital formats. A majority of those ...during a song on a well-maintained record and should not distract from the listening experience. No evidence exists of a record that is shown to be played back
    23 KB (3,722 words) - 04:14, 16 September 2021
  • Here are some practical tips to organizing a listening test. ==Test Collection==
    383 B (48 words) - 20:57, 15 September 2006
  • ...ed to constitute [[transparency]]). As part of a well-designed [[listening test]], useful quality comparison can be made between a selection of encoders pl
    2 KB (309 words) - 21:20, 15 May 2007
  • ...oustic source here. It does not appear to move if we move ourselves in the listening area, like the phantom acoustic source between conventional loudspeakers do ...f the listener. Because of the otherwise almost perfect rendition with the test setups, it seems to become more audible than using conventional loudspeaker
    6 KB (884 words) - 13:33, 26 December 2007
  • The '''ABX Comparator''' allows users to perform a double-blind listening test between two tracks. * [http://www.head-fi.org/threads/setting-up-an-abx-test-simple-guide-to-ripping-tagging-transcoding.655879/#post-9268096 Setting up
    1 KB (149 words) - 17:43, 5 March 2023
  • ...sic. Since quantization error isn’t audible in any real music at useable listening levels, whether dither must be used is more a matter of doctrine than funct ...that can be discriminated in [[TOS 8|scientifically reproducible]] [[Blind test|blind testing]].
    2 KB (311 words) - 21:22, 26 October 2023
  • ...test sample to allow others to reproduce their findings. Graphs, non-blind listening tests, waveform difference comparisons, and so on, are not acceptable means A test of audio quality is ''scientific'' only if it is [[Blind test|blind]]. This eliminates the effects of pre-existing opinions, the placebo
    2 KB (306 words) - 22:55, 1 March 2012
  • ...hydrogenaudio members have from time to time carried out their own private listening tests. Though individual perception of different kinds of artifacts varies | style="width:174px" | Dithering Test (1)<br>Special
    7 KB (967 words) - 09:32, 6 December 2022
  • ...g/~greg/opus/ha2011/ class leader at around 64 kbps] and [http://listening-test.coresv.net/results.htm also at 96 kbps]. As an open format standardised thr Multi-format stereo music listening tests have demonstrated the superiority of Opus at 64&nbsp;kbps and 96&nbsp
    34 KB (5,066 words) - 05:26, 24 April 2024
  • ...//d.hatena.ne.jp/kamedo2/20120729/1343545890 FFmpeg AAC encoders listening test] (in Japanese) includes libvo-aac
    1 KB (180 words) - 19:36, 2 July 2016
  • * [[Foobar2000:Components/Decoding Speed Test (foo_benchmark)|Decoding Speed Test (foo_benchmark)]] Measures decoding speed of audio files. ...onents 0.9/BS2D (foo_dsp_bs2p)|BS2D (foo_dsp_bs2p)]] · Improves headphone listening of regular hi-fi stereo records.
    38 KB (5,181 words) - 12:34, 19 November 2023
  • == Listening tests == The Helix MP3 encoder participated in several listening tests and demonstrated to be amongst the highest-quality encoders for MP3 a
    12 KB (1,781 words) - 12:45, 20 April 2024

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)