Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase:Deletion requests/Open source: Difference between revisions

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:


Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? [[User:Jan|Jan]] 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)
Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? [[User:Jan|Jan]] 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)
* '''keep''' I agree with Jan, besides, it's better to have a quick summary of what's Open Source, rather than the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source insanely huge] article at Wikipedia [[User:Rjamorim|rjamorim]] 12:32, 7 December 2006 (CST)

Latest revision as of 18:32, 7 December 2006

Back to deletion requests

Open source

To vote, use this code: * '''YOUR VOTE''' Reason for vote ~~~~
Info like this belongs in wikipedia, IMO. --pepoluan (talk | contribs) 03:22, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

  • Maybe it's linked to on open source encoder pages, etc? Maybe not. Delete. (sbirtnoc | klat) elibomttoillE 08:58, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
Scratch that, keep. Elliottmobilehttp://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/images/c/c1/Fishysig.PNG 13:42, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? Jan 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

  • keep I agree with Jan, besides, it's better to have a quick summary of what's Open Source, rather than the insanely huge article at Wikipedia rjamorim 12:32, 7 December 2006 (CST)