Foobar2000 Talk:Components: Difference between revisions

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
No edit summary
(took out old conversation)
Line 1: Line 1:
I initially added the 0.8 tags because half the components I was looking for kept turning out to be for 0.8.3, but now that I've click around more, I've found the 0.9 versions for everything, the links on this page just weren't updated. I agree, now it is kinda useless now to have the tags, I just think they're pretty =P
--[[User:Reglib|Reglib]] 18:14, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
yah I think they are pretty too :P Sorry to ruin your work :(
Its just that it wasnt very useful.
Anyway I created a Component section for 0.8.. I'll give it a shot someday
Thanks for your contribution and sorry one again if I have wasted you effort!
--[[User:Eejadx|Eejadx]] 21:04, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
np, the photoshop was 5 minutes, the rest was me trying to learn mediawiki and goofing off instead of doing my real work
--[[User:Reglib|Reglib]] 22:34, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
Someone know if there is a way to set image as a link to another page inside the wiki server?
Someone know if there is a way to set image as a link to another page inside the wiki server?


Line 21: Line 4:


--[[User:Eejadx|Eejadx]] 19:47, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
--[[User:Eejadx|Eejadx]] 19:47, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
I too would also like to know. Also... I've been lazy with my CSS and layouts this year. --[[User:Reglib|Reglib]] 17:57, 12 May 2006 (CDT)


Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- [[User:Canar|Canar]] 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- [[User:Canar|Canar]] 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:57, 12 May 2006

Someone know if there is a way to set image as a link to another page inside the wiki server?

Things like that doesn't work: ([[Foobar2000:0.9 ATSurround Processor (foo_dsp_atsurround)|Image:Example.jpg]])

--Eejadx 19:47, 25 April 2006 (CDT)

I too would also like to know. Also... I've been lazy with my CSS and layouts this year. --Reglib 17:57, 12 May 2006 (CDT)

Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- Canar 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT)